A Rhetorical Analysis of Michael Lind's "Human Spaceflight Should End" by Wyatt Cheney
With the closing of the human spaceflight program, many people would argue that this decision is a disgrace to America and its space program. However, the United States has been very successful using robots like the Mars rovers or the Phoenix …show more content…
Lind believes that since robotic probes have been so successful, there is no longer a need for astronauts. He says “ ... Even if the public pays little attention because there are no astronauts to engage in white-knuckle landings or to clown around for the cameras.” I feel that this is very disrespectful to the astronauts, and takes away from the fact that NASA doesn’t launch just about anybody. They go through years of college, and a very rigorous training regime. The astronauts leave their families and risk everything. They are some of America’s biggest heroes, and Lind attempts to take that away from them.
“The success of robot space probes has discredited the idea that machines are too stupid to do science in space. When that argument for human spaceflight collapses, those that remain are preposterous”
I do agree with Lind on this argument, machines are not “stupid.” The machines are at an advantage in my opinion, they do not require oxygen to function. In certain environments, machines may be better suited for the hostile conditions in space.
The next argument for human spaceflight is that “ ...life has always sought out new environments. Just as plants and animals moved from the