Organizational Structure Essay

1078 Words 5 Pages
1) When considering an organizational structure as complex and varied as that of a criminal justice organization, one must examine the existence of conflicting goals. It is the ultimate goal of every organization to meet established and expected goals. This is a direct measure of that organizations effectiveness. However, when an agency has numerous and complex goals, is it desirable that these goals may conflict? Stojkovic et al., 2008 point out that organizations may seek to attain satisfactory levels of all of their goals, as opposed to attempting to entirely meeting every goal. While certain goals of an agency may conflict with others, this is not necessarily negative, but simply a constraint that may influence the outcome of these …show more content…
A tall hierarchy is consists of several levels of management with a varying number of subordinates (Stojkovic et al., 2008). This is evident in many criminal justice organizations as well as military agencies. On the other hand a flat hierarchy generally has a wide span of control and comprised very few supervisors. Each design has its strengths as well as its weakness. A tall hierarchy is beneficial due to the fact that there is sufficient supervision and access to said supervisors is readily available. Since this model has a low span of control, supervisors manage fewer subordinates, reducing the need for these subordinates to compete for the attention the supervisor (Stojkovic et al., 2008). Due to the increased interaction between a subordinate and his direct supervisor, communications have a less complicated flow and participation is more evident. On the other hand a tall hierarchy can be stifling to an employee. This form of micro managerial hierarchy limits the creativity and individuality that an employee can exhibit. In contrast a flat hierarchy dictates that management must supervisor numerous employees, providing a wide span of control. This format allows for more discretion among officers. The supervisors are not readily available, which present subordinates with the need to develop their decision making skills, allowing them to grow more as leaders. While this form of hierarchy has many advantages such as building the

Related Documents