The Biological Criminal Brain Essay

1344 Words 6 Pages
Nature and nurture are no longer a debate; we see the two working together in concert to produce a genuine expression of the individual. The personalities and habits humans acquire in their lives is as much a biological evolution as it is a social or cultural acclimatization. While some people still have the argument that it is nature or it is nurture many people have come to the realization that is has to be both. Both nature and nurture developed who we are and what we become. So the question would remain which one influences us more on if we become a criminal. In that it is meant people that live outside the acceptable social norms of that society that may involve punishment or rehabilitation. The impression that people become …show more content…
Rush spoke of repeat criminal behavior later called moral depravity. Rush argued Moral depravity is similar to a physical disease, and those who suffer from it are “very properly... subjects of medicine.”(Rush) Rushes theory is related to a billiard ball table in that one or more parts of the psyche can be knocked out and all others can stay in good order and you get partial moral derangement or all can be knocked out and you get total moral derangement. Rush takes a moral stand point when it comes to mental health and crime. Philippe Pinel was French psychiatrist who lived from 1745-1826. Pinel was the director of two insane asylums de Bicetre and later an asylum for women called Salpetriere. Pinel was intrigued by people that were habitual law breakers, seemingly out of their controllable and in all other facets of their life remained sane. Pinel’s theories differed from Rushes in that he took a more analytical approach rather than one based from a moral stand point. When Pinel took over Bicetre he decided to take an independent approach without any preconceived notions of his own or anyone else’s. He made an independent evaluation that led him to reject the thought that insanity was caused by a lesion on the brain. He believed the mind could become ill without and corresponding damage to the brain itself. This implied the mind whish at the time was associated with the sole could become ill and die. This said to the people

Related Documents